IUF | Coca-Cola Workers Network | Monthly : April 2007

Workers at Coca Cola call off 3-day strike - Financial Times (Colombo)

Financial Times (Colombo) Sunday, April 29, 2007

By Bandula Sirimanna

The three-day strike by 250 workers attached to the Coca Cola International Company in Sri Lanka which paralysed the production of 40,000 cases per day has been called off after negotiations between trade union representatives and the management on Friday, a senior official of the company told The Sunday Times FT. The Inter Company Employees' Union had organized the strike demanding that the management abide by the collective agreement reached between the employers, trade unions of the company and the Employers Federation of Sri Lanka, President of the ICEU branch N. Nissanka said. The workers have not been allowed to enter the Coca Cola factory at Kaduwela by the management and the Biyagama Police riot squad had been deployed near the factory to prevent any unruly incidents although it was a peaceful strike.

Some workers were seen carrying placards with slogans highlighting their demands and others were taking their lunch at small temporary shelters decorated with red banners when The Sunday Times FT visited the factory premises on Thursday.

The gates of the factory were closed preventing anyone from entering the premises. Police guarded the entrance to the factory and the workers said that two of the members of the Inter Company Employees Union had been taken into custody by the police.

The workers were also demanding the company should abandon the decision to re-start the night shift which was halted three years ago. The parent company has stopped the night shift as the production standard of workers was low. The union official added that the company management has enrolled new workers on contract and casual basis creating an impact on the job security of permanent employees.

Eight workers including the union leaders have been suspended from their work on baseless allegations, the union leader alleged. He accused the management of delaying payments of the workers salary increments, over time, Sunday special allowance and the pruning of welfare facilities.

A senior official of the company declined to comment on these allegations adding that the management has obtained an interim injunction from courts against the strikers.

The workers of the company had to face severe difficulties owing to arbitrary action taken by the management. The workers also demanded that the company should abandon the decision to re-start the night shift which was halted three years ago. The parent company had stopped the night shift as the production standard of workers was low.

The union president said the company management has enrolled new workers on contract and on a casual basis creating an impact on the job security of permanent employees.

Trade union leaders who brought these matters to the notice of the management have been suppressed and eight workers including the union leaders have been suspended from their work on baseless allegations, he said.

He accused the management of delaying payments of the workers salary increments, over time, Sunday special allowance and the pruning of welfare facilities.

A senior official of the company declined to comment on these allegations adding that the management has obtained an interim injunction from courts against the strikers.

Korea: Unions issue press release warning of industrial action if CCA continues to ignore union demands

Several Korean media agencies have reported on the demands of the IUF-affiliated CCKBC North/Southeast/Southwest unions concerning the possible sale of the Coca-Cola Korea Bottling Company (CCKBC) by Coca-Cola Amatil (CCA). This follows a joint press release by the three unions on the morning of April 27, in which they assert that industrial action will be taken to block access to the plant by potential buyers if CCA management continues to ignore their demands.

In the press statement the unions also explicitly opposed the sale of CCKBC to a private-equity fund, CVC Capital Partners, under any conditions. The Korean press has reported that CVC Capital Partners had teamed up with Woongkin Foods to submit a letter of intent to CCA.

Below is the full text of the press release translated by the IUF Liaison Officer for Korea, Cheong Ok-soon:

Press Release

Date: 27 April 2007

To. Reporters in charge of labor-related in respective press

Concerns: Unions’ position regarding the sale of CCKBC

1. With respect to your esteemed media and efforts for social democracy and freedom of speech.

2. On 15 February, Coca-Cola Amatil (CCA) which is the parent company of Coca-Cola Korea Bottling Company (CCKBC) announced its full-year results statement. As part of this statement, CCA also announced that it is undertaking the assessment of performance and of the best ownership options for the CCKBC with assistance of Mckinsey & Company and Goldman Sachs. CCA made clear on 18 April that the outcomes of these two processes would be assessed alongside each other, and which may or may not result in the divestiture of some or all of CCA’s holding in CCKBC.

3. Regarding the announcement of CCA, we three CCKBC unions (north, southeast, southwest) have asked CCA to provide us with information about the sale of CCKBC and to guarantee unions’ demands: union recognition, continuation of CBA and job security in the transition and post-transition period. CCA and CCKBC had promised to share with us information in regard to our concerns with the strategic review. Yet, CCA ignored this stated commitment, and in March distributed investment and information memorandums about CCKBC. We only came to know of this fact through public media upon the announcement of the closing of bids for the sale of CCKBC on 13 April. This was a thoughtless attitude by CCA which did not totally recognize the existence of the CCKBC unions.

4. Therefore, in a letter to CCA of 19 April 2007, CCKBC unions expressed deep concerns about unfaithful and unfair practices and requested the following,

- providing a short list of potential bidders who will conduct due diligence over the next month

- arranging 3 party negotiation involving CAA, preferred bidder and the three CCKBC unions to discuss all union concerns including (but not limited to) employment security, union recognition and continuation of CBA, package sale of 3 plants, etc.

- continuous information regarding the progress of divestiture of CCKBC.

5. We, wish to reiterate our commitment to full cooperation during this transition period so long as the above requests are fully honored. Otherwise, CCKBC unions have made clear that we will fully oppose CCA’s divestiture plan and will restrict access to the facilities with all means by due diligence teams.

6. In addition, we three CCKBC unions confirm that there is no possibility that we accept CVC (a private equity fund), which has submitted a letter of intent to buy the CCKBC. We will never accept CVC owning CCKBC even if CVC agrees to guarantee unions’ demands. We three unions are planning to demand that CVC should be excluded from the bidders. It is clear that private equity funds have had a harmful effect on the Korean economy and have disregarded workers’ rights always.

7. We three unions emphasize again that we strongly oppose the acquisition of CCKBC by the CVC private equity fund and that CCA must accept unions’ demands and negotiate with unions faithfully. We three unions are giving CCA a warning: CCA will bear the blame for any situation that might occur should CCA intend to refuse union demands.


CCKBC North union 02 801 5338

CCKBC southeast union 055 370 4565

CCKBC southwest union 062 570 3193

Goa Conference adopts constitution of the All India Cola Employees Federation, advances national bargaining agenda

On 4-5 April 2007, 54 delegates from 15 unions from across India representing more than 3,000 workers in Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola met in Goa to adopt the Constitution establishing the All India Cola Employees Federation.

Bringing together unions from both franchise bottlers and company-owned bottlers in the Coca-Cola system, as well as unions in Pepsi-Cola bottling operations, the Federation is mandated to advance the collective rights and interests of tens of thousands of Cola workers throughout India. Through the unity and solidarity of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola unions, the Federation also marks an historic step in countering the pressures of intense market competition between the two largest transnational soft drink companies.

As a national umbrella organization, the All India Cola Employees Federation will organize a campaign based on 9 key demands that require Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola to:

1. Guarantee freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining;
2. Negotiate restructuring with unions;
3. Regularize contract/casual workers;
4. Guarantee parity in wages;
5. Guarantee parity in dearness allowance (cost of living);
6. Stop outsourcing;
7. Provide adequate compensation for exploitation of natural resources like water, while ensuring protection of the environment and the interests of the local population;
8. Ensure proper treatment of effluents;
9. Maintain safety standards in production.

Tackling disparity (inequality) in Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola is a major task of the new Federation. This involves both narrowing the gap between wages and working conditions in company-owned bottling plants and franchise operations, as well as reducing inequality between regular workers and the thousands of casual workers employed under precarious employment practices.

The Goa conference brought to fruition 4 years of organizing, mobilization and national alliance-building through the All India Council of Cola Workers. The Council was created in 2003 with IUF acting as the initial facilitator and secretariat.

Until the formal election of Federation officials at the first Congress later this year, the existing 9-person Steering Committee will continue to facilitate national coordination and mobilization. In addition, the Goa conference added to the Steering Committee Brother Datta Gadhekar from Pune Maharashtra and Brother Radhakrushna from Visakhapatnam - both Coca-Cola Company owned bottling plants.

Coca-Cola Femsa drops out of bidding for Coca-Cola Korea Bottling Company (CCKBC), while private equity CVC Capital Partners fund joins bidding

19 April 2007 | Source: just-drinks.com editorial team

Coca-Cola Femsa is the latest company to step back from the pending sale of Coca-Cola Amatil's South Korean operations.

The Mexican soft drinks unit of Femsa said yesterday (18 April) that it has pulled out of the bidding for Coca-Cola Korea Bottling Corp., which CCA is considering selling.

"We are permanently evaluating opportunities," Coca-Cola Femsa said. "In this case, Coca-Cola Femsa revised the franchise of Coca-Cola Amatil in South Korea, but we decided not to continue with the process."

Local sources had claimed earlier this week that three bids - from SPC, City Venture Capital and Coca-Cola Femsa - had been tabled for the unit.

Separate reports, meanwhile, have claimed that Coca-Cola_Hellenic_Bottling has distanced itself from the sale process.

CCA will take a decision on whether to sell the unit next month.

CVC among bidders for C-C Amatil's S.Korea ops-source

SEOUL, April 18 (Reuters) - Private equity fund CVC is among bidders for Australian soft drinks company Coca-Cola Amatil's South Korean business, a source familiar with the situation told Reuters on Wednesday.

Samlip General Foods and Coca-Cola's Mexico unit Femsa also submitted letters of interest last week to buy the South Korean arm, from the sale of which the Australian company hopes to raise nearly A$700 million ($585.8 million), the source said.

CVC is teaming up with South Korean food maker Woongjin Foods

Russia: Coca-Cola workers in St. Petersburg walk out demanding wage negotiation rights


On April 20 Coca-Cola workers at the CCHBC St. Petersburg plant walked out and setup a picket to protest management continuous pressures on union members, outsourcing practices and the company refusal to meaningfully negotiate wages. About 100 workers demanded real wage negotiations and a pay increase of 30 percent to offset the effects of real inflation on their salary purchasing power. Workers also stood united to demand the reinstatement of Sergei Dolgiy, the union leader at outsourcing services firm ANKOR, supplying workforce to the St. Petersburg Coca-Cola plant.

To view a full photo report of the action click here.

The company did not renew Sergei's contract right after management found out about his union activity. By supporting Sergei at picket workers also made a strong statement demanding to exercise their fundamental right to organize workers at ANKOR free from management retaliation and invoked Coca-Cola's responsibility for the violation of union rights at its contracted labour-hiring agencies.

On April 13, worker protests broke out at the St.Petersburg Heineken plant over the same issue of management refusal to enter real negotiations over wages. Worker members of IUF-affiliated St. Petersburg Food Workers Union
at many other plants joined the action of Coca-Cola workers. Slogans and banners from the recent transatlantic "Tell Coke Every Worker Counts" Union Day of Action were used to tell Coca-Cola management that Russian workers are tired of fake negotiations and demand to fully exercise their fundamental right to collective bargaining over all working conditions including wages.

CCHBC must understand, that in Russia as well – Every worker counts!

A 30 % salary increase, reinstatement of the union leader of agency workers of the plant, Sergei Dolgy, compensation for hazardous work conditions as stipulated in the CBA – these are the main demands of the trade union at Coca-Cola in St. Petersburg, about which the union informed the administration in written form on April 12.
In support of its demands, the union will hold a picket on April 20 in front of the factory gates. This comes as a reaction of sharply deteriorated relationship with management in the last months.


After a similar action two years ago on the background of serious union rights violations, management had started a more cooperative relationship, and an agreement on health and safety had been negotiated subsequently. However, when salary negotiations started in 2006, management started to delay the agreement. With a new HR manager taking over, the relations deteriorated further, which is why the union demands in addition to the above mentioned to release two concrete managers from their function of dealing with the union.

While unions have been trying to build a constructive relationship, management keeps undermining real negotiations. The agreement reached on HSE is being openly disregarded – management just stopped paying compensations for work in hazardous conditions for forklift drivers. Salaries are being raised unilaterally below the inflation rate, and workloads are constantly being increased.

Workers insist in a big step forward in salaries, as the wage negotiations are being delayed for such a long time, and the official inflation rate is by about 10% yearly, with real cost of basic spending (housing, basic food stuffs, electricity and the like) growing much quicker.

The company widely uses agency work, and upon the first steps of agency workers to organize fired the union chairman of „Ankor“ agency workers, Sergei Dolgii. The case is now before the court as one of the precedent cases against the usage of agency labour in Russia in general.

The picket will be supported by other food workers union from St. Petersburg, among them a delegation of Heineken workers currently involved in “work-to-rule” protest in support of similar demands, and by other Coke unions in the country. The joint action will use the same symbol Coke workers in Europe and the Americas had used for their joint day of action at the beginning of April. In Russia as well, Coke must understand – every workers counts!

Korea update: Unions issue statement to CCA and CCKBC management warning of industrial action

With complete disregrard for trade union rights, the management of CCKBC ignored union requests for information on the process of selling-off Coca-Cola Amatil's Korean operations and instead issued a letter directly to all union members giving them a partial update on the situation and calling on them not to listen to "rumours". In response, the three IUF-affiliated unions, representing more than 2000 workers in the CCKBC's three bottling plants, warning of possible industrial action.

18 April 2007

To Management of CCKBC and CCA,

Union likes to reiterate the CCKBC and CCA management’s inconsistency between their promised commitments and honouring of these commitments to the Union, and consequently, express our collective resentment of the members of the Union.

Whilst both management of CCKBC and CCA promised that all matters pertaining to the Union will be fully disclosed to the Union members during the evaluation of various future strategic plans of the company. However, this promise has not been fully honoured. As an example, the management did not communicate with the Union at all regarding matters related to Korean operations that were released on 18 April 2007 in its strategic reviews with its investors. All members of the Union are extremely disappointed at the lack of commitments in communicating all matters that are pertinent to Korean operations.

As the management indicated in its strategic reviews that the short list of potential purchasers will be completed by the end of April 2007 as well as necessary due diligence work to be commenced in May 2007, the Union is requesting the following matters to be duly considered by the management:

1. Management communicates immediately after completion of selection of possible bidders of Korean operations who will be involved in further due diligence processes.

2. Management organises 3 party negotiation involving CCA, preferred bidder, and the Union, to discuss all Union related matters including (but not limited to) employment security of all union members, recognition of the Union, severance payment, etc.

3. Management communicate with the Union continuously regarding the progress of divesture of Korean operations

The Union wishes to reiterate its commitment on full cooperation during the this transition period so long as the above requests are fully honoured.
However, if the above requests are not honoured by the management, the Union intends to fully oppose on the management’s divesture plan and to restrict the access to the facilities by due diligence teams by all means.

The Union appreciates the management’s sincere consideration of the above requests, and looks forward to hearing the replies Terry Davis and his management team in the near future.


All members of CCKBC Union

Korea: unions warn of industrial action if proposed sell-off proceeds without negotiations

On 17 April the IUF-affiliated unions representing workers in Coca-Cola Korea Bottling Company (CCKBC) wrote to David Gonskient, Chairman of Coca-Cola Amatil (CCA), warning of possible industrial action if management continues to make preparations to sell off CCKBC without substantial negotiations with the unions.

The letter, signed by Brother Park Chang-nam, President of the Coca-Cola Korea Bottling North Labor Union, Brother Lee Hoon-jae, President of the Coca-Cola Korea Bottling Southeast Labor Union and Brother Choi Gung-won, President of the Coca-Cola Korea Bottling Southwest Labor Union, states that “... our three CCKBC unions wish to state explicitly that we shall undertake industrial action against CCA’s unilateral process of selling CCKBC operations.”

The warning comes in response to the failure of CCA to acknowlege an earlier request by the three unions for a meeting to discuss the assessment of CCKBC for possible sale, plus the news that CCA has already received bids from potential buyers. Despite reassurances given by CCA CEO Terry Davis on 16 February that management would keep the unions fully informed, it was only through Korean media reports that union members learned that several companies (including the private equity fund CVC Capital) had already submitted bids or letters of intent to purchase CCKBC from CCA. No information about such a bidding process was provided to the unions.

In their letter the unions told CCA Chairman David Gonskient, “not to ignore our unions’ demands and not to undermine our unions’ right to know what is happening to the workplace of our members.” Based on management’s recent actions, ““We believe it is a serious matter if CCA and CCKBC are backing down on the principle of good faith in industrial relations.”

The demands outlined in the 17 April letter require that CCA:

* make a formal apology to three CCKBC unions that CCA is remiss in enacting a sincere industrial relationship since there was no reply to our request for information and no prior notice was given to our unions concerning bids for the purchase of CCKBC.

* provide information on companies which have submitted bids and/or submitted a letter of intent

* provide a comprehensive overview of CCA’s plans for CCKBC including of the possible sale of CCKBC

* give a clear guarantee concerning trade union recognition, CBA renewal and employment security in the “transition” and post-transition period

* arrange a meeting between three CCKBC unions and CCA management to urgently discuss union concerns

The letter conludes with a clear statement on the readiness of their union members to defend their trade union rights through industrial action:

“We, three CCKBC unions are hereby issuing a warning in the strongest terms to be transparent in the whole process of sale and meet our three unions’ demands as stated above. We are in good faith informing you that we will take action to prevent any actual inspection of CCKBC facilities by potential buyers if CCA ignores our three unions’ demands.“

Isdell's "no comment" on union protests at CCE

During the 17 April conference call between The Coca-Cola Company executives and market analysts on first quarter earnings, Matthew Riley from Morningstar asked Neville Isdell about "the labor issues the Coke system seems to be facing in North America." Isdell responded, "Well, the issue is one that is with CCE. We don't want to comment on what our bottlers are doing in terms of a potential labor dispute."

The Coca-Cola Company owns 38% of CCE.

The transcript of the question and answer is below:

Matthew Riley - Morningstar

I was hoping you could address the labor issues the Coke system seems to be facing in North America. Whether this could lead to trouble executing the turnaround you anticipate in the North American market?

Neville Isdell

Well, the issue is one that is with CCE. We don't want to comment on what our bottlers are doing in terms of a potential labor dispute. I think the evidence that you've seen in the past is that we have a very capable bottler that is certainly able to handle these type of issues very effectively with their unions. Clearly there is some discussion around issues at the moment as they restructure. I would anticipate that sensible people will be able to come to sensible solutions.

Click hear to read the full transcript of the conference call.

Transcript of conference call on Coca-Cola Q1 2007 earnings

Below is the full transcript of the the Coca-Cola Company first quarter 2007 earnings conference call that was held on April 17, 2007 at 8:00 am ET. TCCC executives involved in the conference call included: Ann Taylor - VP, Director, IR Neville Isdell - Chairman, CEO Gary Fayard - EVP, CFO Muhtar Kent - President, COO.

Coca-Cola Q1 2007 Earnings Call Transcript
April 17, 2007 at 8:00 am ET


Ann Taylor - VP, Director, IR Neville Isdell - Chairman, CEO Gary Fayard - EVP, CFO Muhtar Kent - President, COO


John Faucher – JP Morgan Bill Pecoriello - Morgan Stanley Robert van Brugge - Sanford Bernstein Bryan Spillane - Banc of America Securities Mark Swartzberg - Stifel Nicolaus Judy Hong - Goldman Sachs Christine Farkas - Merrill Lynch Bonnie Herzog - Citigroup Kaumil Gajrawala - UBS Lauren Torres - HSBC Matthew Riley - Morningstar Ann Gurkin - Davenport



At this time I would like to welcome everyone to the Coca-Cola Company's first quarter 2007 earnings results conference call. (Operator Instructions) I would now like to introduce Ann Taylor, Vice President and Director of Investor Relations.

Ann Taylor

Good morning, and thank you for being with us today. I am pleased to be joined by Neville Isdell, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Muhtar Kent, our Chief Operating Officer; and Gary Fayard, our Chief Financial Officer. Following prepared remarks this morning we will turn the call over for your questions.

Before we get started, I'd like to remind you that this conference call may contain forward-looking statements, including statements concerning long-term earnings objectives and should be considered in conjunction with cautionary statements contained in our earnings release and in the company's most recent SEC report.

In addition, I would also like to call your attention to the fact that we have posted schedules on our company website at thecocacolacompany.com in the investor section which reconcile our results as reported under generally accepted accounting principles, to certain non-GAAP measures which may be referred to by our senior executives in our discussion this morning, and from time to time in discussing our financial performance. Please look on our website for this information.

Now let me turn the call over to Neville.

Neville Isdell

Thank you, Ann and good morning, everyone. I am going to start this morning with a few brief observations about the quarterly results, and Muhtar will then provide details on operational achievements, and Gary will follow with an overview of the financials and he’s going to give you some additional perspective on the Philippines as well.

What you see today is a very strong quarter, delivered by a company and a system that has found its footing, regained its focus and come a long way in retooling its operations. While there is much more that we can and will do, the Coca-Cola Company is today proving that we can meet the commitments that we make.

We said that we would drive growth and profitable brands in packs and channels, and today we are reporting revenue growth of 17% on worldwide unit case volume growth of 6%, our highest quarterly volume growth rate since 2002, while cycling 5% volume growth for the first quarter of last year. We also said that we would maximize our local brand footprint to leverage our sweet spot in the industry. Today we are reporting international growth of 9%, which is our highest quarterly international growth rate since 2000.

We also said that we would grow our core sparkling beverages whilst expanding the footprint of our still portfolio. Today, we are reporting an increase of 5% in sparkling beverages, led by 4% growth in trademark Coca-Cola. That growth includes the rollout of Coca-Cola Zero to 20 additional markets including Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, and France amongst others.

Still beverages increased 9%. The solid growth resulted in share being gained or maintained in key nonalcoholic ready to drink categories, including sparkling, bottled water, juice and juice drinks, sports drinks, and ready to drink tea. So, for the quarter, we've delivered on our commitments.

Now I'd like to give you a new commitment. We will win again in our home market. It will not come quickly and we continue to expect 2007 to be weak, but we do expect to begin seeing sequential improvement in the second half of the year as we execute against our key goals.

Muhtar will address this topic in more detail in a moment, but I want to underscore my absolute focus on North America. We delivered strong financial results this quarter, even with this decline in North America. Strong top line growth resulted in ongoing currency neutral operating income growth of 11%, which is ahead of our long-term growth targets.

The geographic sources of profit growth were, in fact, more balanced as well. Additionally, we delivered solid operating expense leverage, even as we continued to invest to support our brands and build capabilities within our own company-owned bottling operations. Certainly a strong performance to start the year.

So now, let me turn the call over to our Chief Operating Officer, Muhtar Kent, who will provide you with more details.

Muhtar Kent

Thank you, Neville and good morning, everyone. It has been just over 120 days since I assumed my new role. What I would like to cover this morning are my key priorities for 2007 and relate those to our performance in the quarter, as well as expectations for the remainder of this year. These priorities are designed around a simple strategy: continue to innovate, take smart risks, and work closely with our bottlers to drive growth in sparkling and still beverages.

The first priority is to sustain and drive progress in our international business. Second, address the issues in North America, where I've been spending a great deal of time these past four months. Third, increase productivity across the organization and drive leverage on the P&L. Fourth and last, compress and accelerate the commercialization rate of innovation and best practice sharing.

Let's start with the first one, sustaining and driving progress in our international business. Our quarterly results clearly display the strength of our global portfolio and our ability to execute across the entire system, with most of our key markets delivering solid performance. We will continue to build on these results by growing our core sparkling beverages, expanding our still offerings, and executing with precision.

Unit case volume growth was again led by our key emerging markets including China, Russia, Eastern Europe, Southern Eurasia, South Africa and across Latin America. Also, some of our emerging market weak spots from last year continued to rebound as India and Nigeria both delivered solid results for the quarter.

In addition -- and equally encouraging -- is the strength of some of our more developed markets. One of our most consistent performers, Mexico, increased unit case volume 2%, cycling 8% in the prior year on the strength of trademark Coca-Cola driving total sparkling beverage share gain. This is the third consecutive quarter of improvement in Japan, with unit case volume up 3%. Although cycling a 2% decline from prior quarter, the performance across brand portfolios is particularly encouraging and demonstrates the changes we put in place last year. The strategy we are now pursuing there is really paying off. Solid growth in trademarks Coca-Cola, Fanta, Sprite, Enviga Green Tea and Aquarius drove the results, with each gaining share.

The European Union increased unit case volume 11%, as all operating divisions delivered mid single-digit or better growth. I am encouraged by the growth particularly in Europe in Germany and Western Europe, which continued to show progress.

As expected, our business in the Philippines continued to face challenges and experienced declines in the quarter. However, we are taking a number of critical actions to address these issues. At the end of February, we completed the acquisition of the bottling operations in the Philippines previously held by San Miguel Corporation. The bottler will now have full access to the expertise of our management, as well as be fully integrated with our company's overall objectives. With a robust business plan being implemented and an experienced management team in place under Irial Finan’s leadership, the leading share position and strong brand metrics, we believe we are well positioned to return the Philippines market to its former standing as one of our top performers. During 2007, as our program gains traction, we expect to see sequential improvement in unit case volume and return to growth in 2008. Gary will provide more details on the financial impact on 2007 in a moment.

The success in our international operations in the first quarter directly reflects our ability to build on the progress we made in 2006. We've delivered 8% organic growth in sparkling beverages, led by 7% growth in trademark Coca-Cola. This is the highest growth in trademark Coke in international operations since 1998. In fact, sparkling beverages have averaged 6% growth over the past five quarters, confirming our belief that sparkling beverages have not matured, but rather still have great potential. Coke Zero and our new grip bottle, properly directed marketing initiatives such as the integrated activation of the Coke Side of Life at Coca-Cola.com, and efforts to win at the point of sale are prime examples of how we will use innovation and our close partnership with our bottlers to develop marketing campaigns that drive growth.

In addition, we continue to expand our still beverage footprint around the world. Internationally, our still brands increased 16% in the first quarter by leveraging our existing trademarks and successfully integrating our recent acquisitions to improve our offerings to customers and ultimately to consumers. For the E.U. group, still beverages increased 36% and even excluding acquisitions, still increased solid high teens. Our juice and water platforms continue to gain strength with the expansion products such as Minute Maid into India, the pending acquisition of Jugos del Valle in Latin America, and the acquisition of Apollinaris in Europe.

Success requires a robust and rational portfolio. We continue to evaluate all of our options and when necessary, we will selectively make acquisitions for additional speed, scale, as well as capability. A large competitive advantage for us, of course, is our relationship with our bottlers and the strength of our distribution channels. We've seen solid progress in our company-owned bottling operations, which in terms of volume is now the second-largest bottler in the world. The back to basics approach, an improved in-market execution can clearly be seen in our results in Germany as well as in India, amongst many other places.

Now let me focus on my second priority, which is to reestablish consistent growth in our home market, North America. The first quarter results were weak, as expected, and we are clearly not satisfied with the 3% decline in volumes. We’ve got a lot of work to do, but certainly there are signs of improvement.

In the first quarter we demonstrated our commitment to driving growth in trademark Coca-Cola as we activated solid campaigns for Coca-Cola Classic, Diet Coke, and Coke Zero. Integrated campaigns for all three brands included events television advertising linked to retail activation. We returned to the Super Bowl with the Coke Side of Life, to the Oscars with Diet Coke, and most recently built our presence with the NCAA basketball tournament featuring Coke Zero, and of course, our sponsorship of American idol continues to feature all three brands. Our campaigns are creating consumer awareness. Coke Zero continues to gain share, reaching a 1.2 share during the quarter. Diet Coke showed positive growth in the quarter and gained share while Coca-Cola Classic also gained share.

The next round of innovation you will see in the second quarter is the introduction of Diet Coke Plus, our first venture under the Coca-Cola trademark for a sparkling, calorie-free beverage with vitamins and minerals. In still beverages for North America, we continue to make progress in our areas of focus. Trademarks Disani, Minute Maid, Simply, Oswalda and Power-Aid each gained category share.

In teas, while volumes increased by double-digits, there is significant opportunity to improve and we have begun to reset our business. Our recent agreement with Nestle to refocus the DPW joint venture increases our flexibilities in the tea and coffee categories in North America, which we are pursuing vigorously. We're very excited about our recently announced acquisition of Fuse, which includes a variety of tea, juice, and other enhanced beverages and further rounds out our expanding still portfolio.

Overall, we remain totally committed to winning in North America and have an active plan to address the business issues. We are focused on building our system execution capability by developing working relationships with our bottlers based on cooperation and collaboration.

We anticipate continued weakness in 2007, though, the first half of the year. In the second half of 2007, we expect to see sequential improvement and evidence of progress as we execute against our key goals, which are leading growth in sparkling beverages driven by trademark Coca-Cola, delivering the fastest value growth in still beverages, and being the preferred beverage partner for our customers.

Now let me turn to productivity. A very important component to our success in North America as well as around the globe is ensuring we increase productivity. We are delayering and simplifying our structure so we can improve our speed of execution and improve leverage. This will enable us to better align the architecture of the organization to the three pillars that are the core drivers of our top line growth: consumer marketing, commercial leadership and franchise leadership. This is a targeted effort to enable the organization to be more effective, efficient and to remove bureaucracy.

All of our efforts center around avoiding waste and removing distractions that cause us to lose focus on the three pillars mentioned above. These initiatives will result in some cost savings, but importantly will improve clarity on decision-making which will allow for more time to be focused on revenue-generating activities.

Other efforts are longer term and involve driving system efficiencies. There are projects around the global supply chain and common IT platforms. The bottlers have already been doing an excellent job in many respects and it can be seen in the improvement of their returns. We've already experienced success in global procurement of key commodity inputs as well as in Japan with the supply chain management company, where we are using those lessons to build similar models in China and Mexico, particularly as we gain scale in the still beverages. But there is still significant room for improvement across our entire system. As we reintegrate the organization and realize the productivity gains, we'll selectively reinvest behind our three pillars to drive further top line growth.

My fourth priority is compressing the innovation pipeline. This really gets at our speed to market. Our organization has never lacked for innovative ideas. What we've lacked is a discipline to commercialize expeditiously. We are focused on doing fewer things and doing them better. A clear example has been the global success of Coke Zero, which will reach 40 markets representing 75% of total trademark Coca-Cola volume by the end of 2007.

But we are taking a broader view of innovation. It's not just simply product formulations, it also includes such things as the new Coca-Cola grip bottle, which will be available to over 50% of the world's population by the end of 2007; the Coke Side of Life campaign, which will be in over 200 markets; we're using M&A to augment scale and capabilities, for example with Fuse here in North America. It's also brand, price, packaging and channel optimization that we are jointly developing with our bottling partners. And, it is the way we're working with our bottlers to agree on long-term plans for profitable system growth and equitable value share.

While I've identified four distinct priorities, my goal for the year is to deliver on our business plan by driving sustainable top line growth and leverage in the P&L.

In summary, both Neville and I are pleased with the solid start to 2007, but we are not satisfied. While we're moving in the right direction, we still have a lot of work to do. Neville said it best at CAGNY: the opportunity for Coca-Cola as the only truly global beverage company in a growing beverage industry remains significant. Having sustained solid growth in sparkling beverages internationally, we have proven that there is still opportunity in sparkling beverages and our global still portfolio is just beginning to develop.

We have a focused and effective strategic agenda, supporting a renewed confidence in delivering against our long-term growth targets. We know there will be bumps, but with a new culture of innovation, improving speed to market, and maintaining an outward focus, I am certain our work will create long-term sustainable growth and value for our shareholders.

Now, let me turn the call over to Gary Fayard.

Gary Fayard

Thanks, Muhtar and good morning, everyone. As Neville and Muhtar indicated, we are starting the year with a strong financial performance. As you saw in the release, we reported EPS at $0.54 for the first quarter, an increase of 15%. This included a net charge primarily related to an asset write-off in the Philippines from the Philippines bottler, partially offset by gains from the sale of an ownership interest in one of our Brazilian bottlers and from real estate in Spain. Therefore, our adjusted EPS was $0.56 per share, an increase of 14% after considering items impacting comparability in both 2007 and in 2006.

We attribute about a penny of the EPS to timing of concentrate shipments, as concentrate sales growth was slightly ahead of reported unit case growth in the quarter, primarily due to Easter being a little earlier this year.

Net revenue in the quarter increased 17%, that included a 5 point benefit from structural change related to our acquisitions of some bottlers. The growth was also driven by a 6 point increase in concentrate sales, 3 points from currency and 3 points from price and mix benefits.

We grew operating income by 17% on a reported basis, after considering items impacting comparability in the current and prior year quarter, operating income increase 14%, which includes a 3 point benefit from currency. So on an ongoing currency neutral basis, we grew operating income at 11%.

SG&A increased 13% in the quarter, so let me take a moment and walk you through that increase. About 8 points of that 13 point increase were due to the bottler acquisitions, and that is from increased selling and service expenses as we invested for growth in bottling operations, and due to currency. The remaining 5 points we continued to invest solidly behind our brands, and control G&A expenses as we continue to focus on productivity and expense management.

In the quarter, we repurchased approximately $676 million of our stock; as a result, our average shares outstanding in the first quarter of 2007 were approximately 45 million shares lower than the average in 2006. We still anticipate that a range of share repurchase in 2007 will be between $2.5 billion and $3 billion.

In terms of dividends, the board raised the quarterly dividend for the 45th consecutive year by 10% to $0.34 per common share, which is an equivalent $1.36 per share on an annual basis.

Now let me address some of the factors that we see impacting the remainder of 2007. We remain relatively positive on the macroeconomic outlook for the remainder of the year, especially in many of our emerging markets. We will continue to portfolio manage globally, as we expect solid performance in most of our markets with weak performance in North America, particularly in the second quarter as we cycle stronger volume and profit results.

As with the first quarter, we would again expect our consolidated bottling operations to be a positive contributor, as we continue to build world-class operations. As for the acquisition of the Philippines bottler, you should think about it really in two buckets. First, we took a charge this quarter for the write-off of bottles and cases in the Philippines bottler. Second, we expect full year EPS results to be reduced by $0.02 as we invest to return the Philippines bottler operations to growth. Most of this impact will be reflected in the bottling investments group.

Capital expenditure requirements will be slightly less than $100 million and will take the total company capital expenditures for 2007 up to about $1.6 billion. For 2008, we do not expect the Philippines to have any impact on consolidated results. In 2009, the operations should start contributing to growth. That and the impact on 2008 would include covering the interest cost from the acquisition.

As for items below operating income in the P&L, I'd like to remind everyone that we still expect net interest costs to increase primarily due to lower cash balances and higher debt balances due to share repurchase, acquisitions such as the Philippines bottler, dividends, and capital spending.

Also keep in mind that equity income will be negatively impacted by our reduced ownership position in Coca-Cola Fimsa and our Turkish bottler as well as selling our equity interest in one of our Brazilian bottlers this quarter.

With regard to taxes, we ended the quarter with an underlying effective tax rate of 23%, and we would expect to remain at that underlying effective rate for the remainder of the year.

Let me move to currency. As I mentioned, we saw a positive impact from currencies for the quarter on operating income of 3%. That was in line with our expectations. We continue to put coverage in place and are now effectively covered for the full year on both the yen and the euro. Based on current spot rates and the expected impact of coverage in place, we expect a small positive impact from currencies on full year 2007 results.

Before I close, I wanted to remind everyone about the 8-K we filed with SEC 2 weeks ago containing the additional segment detail for the two new operating groups, Eurasia and Pacific. Please go to our website and pull the information down to assist in your modeling.

Those are the topics I wanted to cover this morning, now we can turn the call over to your questions.

Question-and-Answer Session


(Operator Instructions) Our first question will come from the line of John Faucher – JP Morgan.

John Faucher - JP Morgan

Good morning, everyone. I wanted to follow-up a little bit on the price mix line, which came in very nice this quarter. Can you give us a little guidance in terms of with the change in concentrate pricing from what we can see from a CCE standpoint in terms of looking at plus 4 and then net it down to zero, can you talk a little bit about how that's going to work out financially and what goals you have in place for CCE in that regard?

Can you also give us an idea on the mix side in terms of how we're seeing some of the bottler case mix, is that a positive which is offsetting some of the negative country mix? How should we map that out over the balance of the year? Thanks.

Gary Fayard

Thanks for the question. Let me take price mix first. What you're seeing is 3 points of price mix. About 2 points of that is coming from the core, and 1 point is an impact from bottling operations. That price mix is really from I'd say the quality of our growth with very strong sparkling beverage growth as well as very balanced growth across the world, particularly EU, Latin America, Japan. You're seeing positive mix come through, country mix come through even with an offset from North America, as well as the quality of that growth with a strong sparkling beverage growth.

Muhtar Kent

Yes, essentially in those numbers, the U.S. concentrate price is already included embedded in those numbers and, essentially we've also had very good benefits in Latin America from pricing as we drive revenue growth management across all of the markets, as well as in the EU.

John Faucher - JP Morgan

CCE had talked about meeting certain goals to get the concentrate pricing netted down to zero. Is that showing up in the price mix line, or is that showing up in the SG&A line if you are in fact netting the concentrate pricing down?

Gary Fayard

John, it's showing up in the price mix line.

John Faucher - JP Morgan

Even with that, assuming that CCE's meeting their targets, even with that you're still putting up high quality growth there on the price mix line?

Gary Fayard

That's correct.


Your next question comes from Bill Pecoriello - Morgan Stanley.

Bill Pecoriello - Morgan Stanley

Good morning, everybody. Muhtar, you had mentioned some productivity benefits as one of your goals. You mentioned delayering, indirect procurement, supply chain. Can you quantify any of this or talk about the timing in terms of what kind of funds would be available for reinvestment?

Also with the recent meeting you had with the bottlers in China, I guess supply chain was one of the topics. Can you help us all understand what was discussed with the bottlers at that meeting?

Muhtar Kent

You need to think of this activity this ongoing activity, Bill, in various buckets. The first is the architecture of our organization, with the primary purpose of that being really delayering and ensuring that we have speed, better focus, less bureaucracy, much more improved time in terms of our execution. That, of course, will yield some savings. We're in the process of analyzing what we do with those savings and how we reinvest, how much we reinvest, and how much we actually put to our bottom line in terms of leverage. I can't quantify any further. The international piece of that work is completed. We're completing some further work on that in North America.

The second bucket is some of the other productivity work that is going on at the moment in the Company that is related to our indirect cost inside the total Coca-Cola Company. Gary and his team are leading that work stream.

The third piece is the whole area of longer term supply chain initiatives for the entire system, which is a much bigger number and there's different buckets of work going on across the world in that area. If you look at it in three groups, that's as much as I'd like to say on that right now.

Neville Isdell

If I could just build on that, you'll see that there is operating leverage coming through in this quarter. We believe you'll continue to see that. If you go back to when we did not appear to have operating leverage, really it was the 2005 $400 million reinvestment back into marketing. If you look at our top line growth, you can see that clearly has worked, adding the fuel to the brands.

So, just echoing what Muhtar has said, you can create operating leverage in two different ways: you can keep your expenses flat where they are and push the top line by reinvesting some savings; that's one way we're looking at it. But you've got to be sure that you've got effective programs. We think we've got those effective programs in the works right now. Also, of course, there will be some that will actually just naturally flow down to the bottom line, as well. You'll see that evolve in the quarters ahead.

Bill Pecoriello - Morgan Stanley

The recent meetings in China with the bottlers, how would you characterize them?

Neville Isdell

First of all, the headlines very positive. Muhtar was talking about improved bottler relations in his earlier comments. Obviously their numbers -- if you look at the international bottlers -- are improving. They have a strong belief in how we're moving forward. We spent quite a lot of time sharing some of the innovations for the future. I think we're bringing the bottling system in line with us.

Obviously, we are focusing on execution, which is their side of the bargain and something that clearly they agreed they have to improve upon. The other piece of the other bucket that Muhtar talked about -- we spent a lot of time on that -- which is what we can do systemically in order to improve the overall health of the system as a whole.


Your next question comes from the line of Robert van Brugge - Sanford Bernstein.

Robert van Brugge - Sanford Bernstein

In connection with your increased incidence rate in Mexico, you had agreed with your bottlers increased marketing spending this year. So far in the first quarter, the margin trends are still pretty much consistent with last year. Are we starting to see this increased marketing spending in the P&L at this point?

Gary Fayard

Yes, and you're right. When we increased the incidence rate in Mexico, we also agreed that we would increase or spend back some of that incidence increase in marketing as well as the creation and exploitation, if you will, of the still portfolio in Mexico. You are seeing us do that; that is happening. The marketing, remember, is on a sales curve. So it's curved over the full year, but there is an increase in marketing in Latin America. That includes the impact from the increased incidence.


Your next question comes from the line of Bryan Spillane - Banc of America Securities.

Bryan Spillane - Banc of America Securities

Muhtar, a couple of questions relative to North America. Going into this year, pretty high expectations in terms of retail pricing. I'm just curious to know your assessment so far in terms of price elasticity. Has volume responded more or less in line with where you thought it would be?

Looking forward, what are your expectations on how you'll monitor that and whether or not there's going to be a need to maybe act in terms of moderating price increases?

Muhtar Kent

Although we have not been happy at all with the results for the first quarter for our North American operations, essentially they are actually slightly better than our expectations and what we had in our budget. What we see is generally, of course -- and particularly the sparkling category overall as well as in segments like orange juice and juice-containing beverages – are very large price increases, but we see also in the retail environment the actual elasticity and actual demand elasticity for our products based on individual packages has been generally in line with expectations; what we've expected based on those price increases.


Your next question comes from the line of Mark Swartzberg - Stifel Nicolaus.

Mark Swartzberg - Stifel Nicolaus

Muhtar, a question for you regarding Japan, nice to see another quarter of positive volumes there. Georgia seems, relatively speaking, a little better positioned than it was a year ago. Nonetheless, it looks like margins are going down in that market for you. You're spending more there.

Is that a fair assessment? How would you characterize the competitive environment and the retail environment across your portfolio, not only for the ready-to-drink coffee, but your total portfolio?

Muhtar Kent

Well, I think what I'd like to say is on Japan, six of our core brands grew double-digits in Q1, and we've strengthened the core by refocusing our commitment. Sokenbicha tea remains a strong brand, delivered good volume growth; and trademark Coca-Cola has shown stabilization and has actually grown now with The Coke Side of Life campaign, and more to come in that area. In general, I think we're happy with where we are with our stabilization and return to growth in Japan.

As far as coffee is concerned, the core brands of coffee grew. What is also very encouraging in Japan is that in the entire quarter our vending machines and our entire vending segment has grew, which is also very important for our margins. Essentially we are focused, we are spending in the market, and we believe that our sequential improvement in Japan is going to continue.

Mark Swartzberg - Stifel Nicolaus

Great, that's helpful. Just to close that thought on the spending side. When you think about the level of spend today, perhaps on a per case basis versus a year ago, 18 months ago versus looking forward, how do you feel about that number? There's been a step up investment. Do you see it stepping up further?

Muhtar Kent

I don't see any significant changes compared to 12 or 18 months ago, overall. There may be some timing in there, but I don't see anything materially changing there. And I think we're at the reasonable rate right now. I don't see it going up any further.

I think the critical thing is that our entire bottling system is in a much different place, it's energized and everything else we're doing for productivity in the market is working; and the growth, of course, is the key to everything.


Your next question comes from the line of Judy Hong - Goldman Sachs.

Judy Hong - Goldman Sachs

Good morning. I'm wondering if you can update us further on your tea strategy going forward, both in U.S. and outside the U.S. given the changes to the BPW joint venture? Particularly North America, if you look at your tea portfolio, whether this is a category where you may need to be more aggressive on the acquisition front?

Muhtar Kent

First, just two sentences on the BPW. As you know the BPW arrangement has been recast and now essentially it's for all teas across the world with the exception of Japan and now North America; and also coffee, both sides are free to do what they want in the area of coffee.

Now, let me focus on tea. BPW arrangement with the Nestea brand has been successful in many, many markets and will continue to be successful in many, many markets around the world. USA was one market where we believed we were not winning in tea, we needed more flexibility, and we are intent on winning in tea in the U.S. market.

The results so far in the last two years have not been acceptable, are not acceptable and we are going to win in tea. We cannot afford not to win share in tea and we cannot afford not to grow ahead of the market in a very big category that is growing in the United States. That's the objective of all of the exercise that we've gone through. You will see us refocusing what we have in our portfolio with Nestea, with Gold Peak, with Enviga, with other brands as well as looking at new opportunities in the market in rapid fashion.


Your next question comes from the line of Christine Farkas - Merrill Lynch.

Christine Farkas - Merrill Lynch

Thank you very much. Good morning. Muhtar, you talked about brand, pack and price architecture internationally and how that's successful. In looking at North America, can you point to what the real efforts are here in North America? Is it squarely focused on go to market strategy? Or is the brand pack price architecture something that has to be aligned more quickly? Thank you.

Muhtar Kent

Both. Go to market strategy is critical as well as the BPPC architecture is critical as we move forward in order to ensure that we have revenue growth activities, management in the marketplace, and that we align consumer needs and the consumer better to our brand price pack and channel architecture in the United States. There's going to be a lot of activity in that area, including simple things like redesigning some of our labels to look more attractive. Looking at the entire merchandising sets by channel from convenience stores all the way into retail and different parts of retail and how we can generate further impulse in the marketplace, which has all worked and continues to work very favorably for us in Latin America, across Eurasia, and across parts of the EU.

The test in Denver that we've had, we're doing some tests in Denver with CC and successive tests are actually showing that it's a simple architecture, but it works. It works very effectively.

Christine Farkas - Merrill Lynch

Your corporate expenses, is there any investment in that line for overall system productivity at this stage, or is that a good run rate in terms of year-over-year growth?

Gary Fayard

Within the Corporate expense line, there's slight investment in productivity, investments for system initiatives, but it's primarily just kind of year-on-year growth. Underlying the G&A expenses, underlying in corporate, in fact, we're below our budgeted rate so we're really focused on holding those expenses.


Your next question comes from the line of Bonnie Herzog - Citigroup.

Bonnie Herzog - Citigroup

Good morning, everyone. My question is for Muhtar and Neville. It's quite clear you're not satisfied with the business in North America. I'm curious, when you look out over the next several years, is there some concern that this could be a leading indicator in any way, shape or form? Either the consumer here in North America, the way you go to market, the products? If so, because I know we're different all around the world, how do you try to prevent that? Or is it the reverse? Are you really trying to, again, incorporate the best practices that you mentioned, Muhtar, in trying to fix North America?

Neville Isdell

Let the non-American here start first. I don't think there's any fundamental difference. After all, it's what happened in America that built the business around the world. There are a number of issues facing us at the moment. The headwinds of the pricing are clearly the major headwind that we have with regard to sparkling beverages.

There's also this whole issue of commitment and belief. And you heard me say, you heard me at CAGNY about around the world people looking at me when I came back, when I said we'll get sparkling beverages growing again, with a level of disbelief. Obviously the pricing headwinds have held back North America. But I and Muhtar were with a number of bottlers over the last week. They have a belief that what we have coming along the pipeline, Diet Coke Plus now, what's happening with Coke Zero, et cetera that we now have the tools to actually replicate what we've done in the rest of the world in North America, whilst building out our still beverage portfolio. So I don't think there's anything exceptional about the United States.

Remembering that you'll see the same sort of sticker shock in the Hispanic community, a lot of them who were immigrants who were consuming the product in other parts of the world. So the headline for us is that there is sticker shock here, but number two, that we have the consumer marketing which is working. We also have the bottler commitment in terms of franchise leadership. I think if you talked to the bottlers you'll feel a whole new level of confidence and a commitment in terms of the operational side of what is needed.

John Brock has said that one of the things that he's picked up is there are lessons from around the world that we need to pick up in North America and I think that's a very good sign. Muhtar, do you want to build off that?

Muhtar Kent

Yes, just to refocus again on the consumer, connecting with our core consumers and industry with well received creative and highly rated messaging. You saw examples of that in the Super Bowl, NCAA, Oscars, improving the performance of Coke Zero and Diet Coke which are actually significantly, significantly outperforming the sparkling category. My Coke Rewards program, now over 4 million members. Again, connecting with our chief consumer target base.

On the commercial leadership, we are aligned. I repeat, we are aligned with CCE on segmented merchandising, which is part of the BPPC architecture and a rollout of that. It's going to cover about a fourth to maybe even a third of our large source supermarkets by the end of this year. Agreement also with CCE to build total beverage account team, again a very important, significant area in commercial leadership.

Then also on franchise leadership, the third pillar, again, aligned beverage growth agenda with all of our top to top bottlers. So again, with specifics on product innovation, we've mentioned Diet Coke Plus, but there are many others in the area of packaging, in the area of how we create impulse at the point of sale.

Then we've reorganized our United States business along the lines of our international business to focus on the three core pillars, focusing on sparkling, focusing on stills, and focusing on new and emerging markets; we have put very experienced people against all those three areas.

The other important thing is you walk around the U.S. market, Bonnie, you walk around the U.S. market and we've lost the drive to create impulse. That's what we're bringing back. No signage. The whole signage program for the world started right here in the United States 30, 40 years ago. Now you walk around Latin America, you walk around Europe, you walk around Asia, you walk around Africa everywhere you have signs that say ice cold Coca-Cola served here, not in the United States. That's creating the impulse, again back to basics and we know we can do it.

So it's both. Bringing best practices from outside and then leveraging the power of the category, which is bigger than anywhere else in the world here in the United States. Doing both at the same time.

Bonnie Herzog - Citigroup

That was very helpful. So in terms of timing, you're thinking by the end of this year, will it take you maybe until early next year to do a lot of what you said? Because it all sounds great.

Muhtar Kent

I don't want to comment any more on the timing. I think you see our sense of urgency.


Your next question comes from the line of Kaumil Gajrawala - UBS.

Kaumil Gajrawala - UBS

Good morning, everyone. To the extent that you beat your top line growth algorithms, what impact could this have on your future CapEx? Potentially does it limit any increase in your cash return to shareholders? Also can you talk about the macro economic backdrop in some of the developed markets like Western Europe and Japan and how this may have helped results?

Gary Fayard

Relative to CapEx, it should not have any real impact on CapEx, actually, because most of our CapEx is in some of the finished products businesses in North America, some of the bottling and bottling investments, which are really kind of not permanent investments for us. No change in business model. I don't see much change in CapEx.

Relative to dividends, we've been very consistent and have been increasing dividends at a pretty good clip over the last few years. So we would expect to continue to see dividend increases. Again, an annual decision that we'd be looking at the end of this year, but have a dividend policy in place for this year.

Relative to macro economic trends, Muhtar, do you want to comment on that one or Neville?

Neville Isdell

I'll pick that up. There is a broad optimism you've seen what the OECD is saying, what the World Bank is saying. I think that global growth is going to continue at the rate that we've seen over the past couple of years for '07 and through into '08. That's really reflected in our plans.

The one that you still would query, I suppose, would be Japan. I think we're cautiously optimistic about that country coming out of stagnation and given the importance of Japan, together with the actions that we're taking in the Japanese business which are becoming apparent in terms of being successful, we are becoming more bullish but cautiously optimistic, I would put it, about Japan.


Your next question comes from the line of Lauren Torres - HSBC.

Lauren Torres - HSBC

I was hoping you could talk a bit more about product build outs, maybe even more importantly the potential for acquisitions in North America. Obviously we heard about your acquisition of Fuse. I was just thinking about if we should expect similar deals in the works. Basically, how are you thinking about internally developing brands in the U.S. versus acquiring brands?

Neville Isdell

Developing brands let me pass that to Muhtar in a second, but we really don't comment on acquisitions. I still stay with what we've said all along that we're going to do both. That would be largely bolt-on. But opportunities come up, and we evaluate every opportunity and look to see whether that is the right way to build our portfolio. Muhtar made the comments in his remarks that that's what we would do. Buying is sometimes the right way.

What we have is an innovation pipeline coming along where we are building and building at a rate that we have not been building in the past. Even if you look at patents that we're getting registered in terms of new benefits that we could add to our own beverages, you'll see that in the innovation pipeline.

Muhtar, would you like to talk about just about what's coming down to the pipe from the build side for North America?

Muhtar Kent

There's no question, we have some clear winners. We've mentioned Coke Zero, the Simply trademark is really a great winner. We're excited about Vault, the recent launch of Vault Red Blitz, with a huge immediate consumption focus. Energy continues to gain share in this competitive category against our principal competitor as well as against the market, the flavored waters. You'll see us doing a lot of critical extensions. You'll see us being more active in the area of ready to drink coffee.

As we said, we launched Coca-Cola Cherry Zero in the quarter. You'll see more extensions around Coke Zero, the success of Coke Zero leveraged to more extensions. Diet Coke Plus and what the implications that has for some of the other products. You'll see us again developing and leveraging Fuse. We feel it's a huge opportunity.

So those are just some of the ideas that I want to share with you in terms of how we feel about building internally. Enviga is another one. You'll see us again being active in the area of tea, Gold Peak. Those are just some of the things that I can highlight to you what we feel in terms of both what's in our innovation pipeline and how we intend to quickly commercialize and build internally as well as strategically add on any bolt-on acquisitions.

Lauren Torres - HSBC

I guess it would be fair to say that your bottlers are encouraged by the pipeline coming through?

Muhtar Kent

If you talked to them, I believe that's what they would say.


Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Riley - Morningstar.

Matthew Riley - Morningstar

I was hoping you could address the labor issues the Coke system seems to be facing in North America. Whether this could lead to trouble executing the turnaround you anticipate in the North American market?

Neville Isdell

Well, the issue is one that is with CCE. We don't want to comment on what our bottlers are doing in terms of a potential labor dispute. I think the evidence that you've seen in the past is that we have a very capable bottler that is certainly able to handle these type of issues very effectively with their unions. Clearly there is some discussion around issues at the moment as they restructure. I would anticipate that sensible people will be able to come to sensible solutions.


Your final question will come from the line of Ann Gurkin -Davenport.

Ann Gurkin - Davenport

Good morning. Two things. One, can you talk about the strategy for Powerade in the U.S. in terms of pricing and marketing? Secondly, I believe at CAGNY you talked about pushing into or developing volumes in emerging markets and your strategies in terms of using existing bottlers, acquiring bottlers, or using JVs in terms of distribution?

Muhtar Kent

Yes, let me take the one on Powerade. Essentially, we've gained volume as well as value in Powerade and we continue to be cautiously optimistic in terms of the category and also the competitive position of Powerade. You will see us accelerating Powerade in retail channels this year. The Powerade option expansion is an example of that, the NCAA commercials and so forth. So certainly we feel that there's runway ahead of Powerade and that it will gain, continue to gain traction as well as competitive advantage.

As far as the question you asked about international. Basically, I've said it before. As we expand our portfolio across the world, whether it's Latin America, Europe, Asia, the traditional models that we have worked with for the last 100 years, 120 years may not always be best uses for developing fast, quickly our business in these noncarbonated and particularly juice and juice-containing beverage categories. And in those areas where we are trying out some new models with our bottling partners that are more close to what we call JV models and based on sharing of the opportunities and sharing of the investments as well as equitably sharing the value created rapidly in those segments. That's basically what I'd like to say. Does that sufficiently answer your question?

Ann Gurkin - Davenport

Yes. Are you raising prices on Powerade in the U.S.?

Muhtar Kent

I don't really want to comment on that right now. But if you looked at the Nielsen numbers, you won't see that happening.

Neville Isdell

Thank you, everyone. Thanks Muhtar and Gary. I want to just emphasize to all of you who joined us this morning, that this one quarter is a strong start to the year. We are continuing to build off the successes that we saw in 2006. So we do have consistency, we do have momentum. I am confident that our strategies are working.

As I've mentioned in every quarter since my return, execution and maintaining an outward focus on our customers and consumers are critical for our success. That consistency you're going to see continuing. We continue to remain focused on the long-term health of the business. Again, I've said that since day one, everything we're doing is looking at building this business for long term, sustainable growth and therefore building value for our share owners. Thank you very much, everyone. Good-bye.

Australia's C-C Amatil Draws Bids for S.Korea Unit Reuters

Yesterday was the deadline for bids for the purchase of Coca-Cola Bottling Corporation (CCKBC) from Coca-Cola Amatil. According to local news reports bidders include Korean food and beverage firms CJ, Lotte ChilsungDongwon F&B, Namyang Dairy Products, Samlip General Foods and the private equity fund, CVC Capital Partners.

Australia's C-C Amatil Draws Bids for S.Korea Unit
Thu Apr 12, 2007 7:02 AM BST30

SEOUL (Reuters) - Australian soft drinks company Coca-Cola Amatil Ltd. said on Thursday it has drawn several potential suitors for its troubled South Korean bottling business, in a deal that could fetch up to around $400 million.

Coca-Cola Amatil said in February it appointed Goldman Sachs JBWere to review its South Korean business, which it bought in 1998 for $461 million but faces stalled growth as more consumers turn to healthier, low-sugar drinks.

Goldman Sachs JBWere said in a research report on Thursday that given the franchise's poor track record, the business was likely to be sold for around A$400 million-$500 million ($330.3 million-$412.9 million), below its book value of A$699 million.

"Today was the deadline for Coca-Cola to receive letters of intent. We are pleased with the responses from companies," a Seoul-based spokeswoman for Coca-Cola said. She declined to elaborate.

Domestic media said several food companies, including Dongwon F&B, Namyang Dairy Products and Samlip General Foods, have expressed interest in buying Coca-Cola's South Korean business.

Local media also cited private equity fund CVC Capital Partners and South Korean food and beverage firms CJ and Lotte Chilsung as possible bidders.

The companies were not immediately available for comment.

Coca-Cola controls 48 percent of South Korea's soft drinks market but lost volume following a recall of Coca-Cola last July after a woman poisoned some Coke.

Transatlantic union action report: Coca-Cola workers demand basic rights and guarantees


In February, Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE) – Coca-Cola's largest bottler - announced that it would eliminate 3,500 jobs (5% of its workforce), affecting both North America and Europe. Unions were neither consulted nor alerted beforehand. On 21 March, 2007 the 25th IUF Congress unanimously supported an emergency resolution submitted by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT), representing around 14,000 CCE and Coca-Cola workers in the USA. To demonstrate that Coke workers rejected CCE's arbitrary actions, the IBT and the IUF organized an initial symbolic Transatlantic Day of Action for April 2, 2007 and requested support from a number of IUF-affiliated unions representing close to 200,000 Coke workers worldwide. On April 2, workers at CCE plants and distribution sites in the USA, Canada, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Luxembourg as well as at Coca-Cola plants in Guatemala and Uruguay showed solidarity by wearing stickers saying "Tell Coke Every Worker Counts!". In some locations workers and union representatives held gatherings and rallies, distributed leaflets explaining the reasons behind the action, and raised them with local management.

Read the full report of the Transatlantic Union Day of Action at CCE on the IUF website click here.

Isdell's false multiplier effect: "jobs creation" in the Philippines = regular jobs destruction, rise in precarious employment

The CEO of the Coca-Cola Company, Neville Isdell, was recently in the Philippines, marking the 100% takeover of Coca-Cola Botllers Philippines Inc (CCBPI) from San Miguel Corporatin. Disregarding the concerns of unions raised over the past 3 months, while promising TCCC's "commitment" to the Philippines, Isdell has once again ignored the consequences of the dramatic rise in precarious employment throughout Coca-Cola operations. In fact in an interview with the local media service ABS-CBN, Isdell claims that 10 jobs are created for every one new Coca-Cola job. But the reality is that the are no new regular jobs created, only precarious jobs. The new management of CCBPI has in fact launched the hiring of 1,000 people as "account developers" whose task it is to INCREASE outsourcing and third-party distribution and - most important of all - these are temporary NON-UNION jobs!

ABS-CBN: People look to Coca-Cola in the Philippines as more than just a popular product. It's a source of livelihood. It's a source of economic activity. It's a source of jobs. What is the commitment of Coca-Cola to the Philippines?

Isdell: You talked about jobs, and that is a very important piece in the overall equation. One of the things we track, we do this country by country, we look at what we call a multiplier effect. For every job that we will add, there are actually 10 jobs added to the society overall, so the multiplier is very high -- people making signs, advertising so that's the first piece.

Read the full interview below.

Soft drinks giant Coke to quench RP’s thirst for more investments

ABS-CBN Interactive 10 April 2007

Mr. Neville Isdell, Chairman and CEO of the world’s largest beverage firm The Coca-Cola Company, recently sat down for an exclusive interview with ANC anchor David Celdran to talk about the Atlanta-based firm’s operations in the Philippines.

Coke, the best selling soft drinks brand in the country, said it was committed to increasing its investments in the Philippines despite a weak market condition as consumers shift to healthier drinks.

Coke recently purchased a 65 percent stake in the Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines Inc. (CCBPI), which bottles and sells Coke products in the country, grabbing control over the firm from Philippine beer giant San Miguel Corp. (SMC).

Q: After 80 years of solid working relationship, why did San Miguel and Coke decide to terminate that partnership?

Isdell: Well, yes it has been a solid working relationship for many, many years, but it has been in many forms. And if you go back to when I first came here in 1981, there was a joint venture put together because at that point of time, SMC and the banks at that time, which were the Sorianos, they really weren't happy about the way the business was going. Neither were we. So we put a new organization, which was CCBPI.

So, what we're doing now, in a way, is not fundamentally different from what we were doing in the past…and we think we need to restructure in a certain way.

Q: Why 100 percent?

A: For us, this is our Coke business. We believe that we actually can be very successful in the Philippines in the same way as we were when we came in. So we took the view that it would be appropriate for us to give them the capital they want to put elsewhere and for us to take control of the business again.

Q: There's an open admission that the Coca-Cola Company is not happy with the way Coca-Cola is being run in the Philippines. The last time Coke bought a stake in San Miguel's bottling corporations was in 1991, but that was a 31-percent stake. Now Coca-Cola is buying in once again and has actually bought out the remaining 65 percent of San Miguel’s stake in the local bottler. So that is an indication that indeed Coca-Cola is in trouble in the Philippines?

A: In 1981, I remember I was there, and I remember both parties said that they're not happy with the performance of the company in the Philippines. Very frankly, today, both parties have said that they're not happy with the performance of the company. Look at the results, you can't deny. That doesn't mean that we don’t believe in the Philippines. That doesn’t mean that we don't believe the significant growth in the Philippines. It's not just an admission from us, but an admission from both parties. I think SMC would say the same thing. And that's the nature of business.

Q: You have acquired the 65-stake of San Miguel for $590 million. Now some analysts said that's a little bit on the high-end. Is that how important acquiring CCBPI was and I guess in the same way, is that how important the Philippine market is to Coca-Cola?

A: I think if you go as far as $590 million, you clearly have made a stake in the Philippines. It's not just about the importance but about your confidence in the Philippines and don't forget the balance, the other 35-percent we own already so if you value that, you are talking of valuation close to a billion dollars that we have invested in this country. It's a very clear endorsement of our belief in the Philippines. It's also a belief that that's a fair valuation.

Q: And part of that negotiation includes a non-compete clause in San Miguel for non-alcoholic beverages. But after a period of time, that expires. Is that going to be a problem for Coca-Cola? That San Miguel will be producing its own line of non-alcoholic beverages?

A: Well, there's an assumption that that's what they're going to do. If we're competing, we have confidence in our ability to compete with other players in the market and anyone else who decided to come to compete in the future.

Q: Speaking of competition, sales volume of Coca-Cola products have fallen consistently over the past few years. What challenges or what conditions in the market place do you think have contributed the decline?

A: Our advertising has not been quite on the right stand but it is today. We have a new global campaign. This is not just a Philippine company but a global company.

Q: So the previous branding was a problem in the Philippines?

A: Globally.

Q. Globally? So that includes the Philippines. That was one factor that contributed to the decline?

A: Before we didn't have a strong advertising campaign.

Q: But there's more to that, I’m sure.

A: Yes, there's more to that. But don't forget that we've experienced our fastest growth since 1998 in Coca-Cola to last year. And that explains what's happening between 1998 and 2006 globally. So there is an analogy. Then if we go to some other specifics, I don't believe that we have been investing. When I say investing, pulling out the impetus out there for what's called the first moment of truth when the consumer meets the product.

Q: So it's the experience of the consumer when he confronts a Coca-Cola bottle or can?

A: That is something that is part of what you do in total distribution of your merchandise. You will see, if you look on our programs going forward, that is where the emphasis is going to be.

Q: So it's not just making it available everywhere? It's actually presenting it differently?

A: Well, what's relativity? A relativity is it could be standing in a shelf somewhere at the back or it could be right at front in a brand new refrigerator, iced Coke. That's a totally different proposition.

Q: So distribution is going be one of the key areas?

A: Distribution is one but also making sure that we have that product upfront. Iced coke because that's how it tastes best.

Q: Affordable and available beverage for the people?

A: It’s affordability, it’s availability, it’s acceptability. But the fourth one of course is activation.

Q: What about the product or brand mix in the Philippines. I mean, clearly, there has been a lot of competition. Consumers have a lot more choices in so far as both sparkling and non-sparkling beverages. Are you going to increase the product mix? Are we going to see more product innovations abroad coming to the Philippines?

A: Yes. But I’m not saying immediately. Because what we're going to do is we're going to reinforce what we have today, led by the Coke brand. The consumers are looking at a broader range. We've got some strong water propositions. we've got powdered drinks, Eight O’Clock. You'll see us widening the portfolio to energy drinks.

Q: You know this country more than some locals do. What does it take to turn the market around? What does it take to succeed in the Philippines as far as Coca-Cola is concerned? What are the unique conditions in the Philippines that you can take advantage of?

A: What is unique is that this country has a real passion for, I believe, our brands. To me there's something about the Filipino who loves to have fun, who loves to enjoy special occasions. There's an ambiance about the Philippines that fits the ambiance of carbonated soft drinks, of sparkling drinks, of Coca-Cola. I really got to understand as much as I can about the culture, to understand what “pakikisama” was, what “utang na loob” was, or simply taking “meriendas” or fiestas. There is energy, a sense of loving life in this society, which I think matches our brand so well. That's what i discovered in the 80s.

Q: So do you still see a lot of growth in the traditional Coca-Cola products?

A: I see a lot of growth still.

Q: How do the non-traditional products fit into the business plan? Will these play minor roles in the market or do you see these increasing as well?

A: No. Actually, the fastest growing area is non-alcoholic ready-to-drink. We have by far the strongest can in sparkling. We are clearly the strongest global player. We are the number one juice player in the world. We put some brands in Russia, Europe, North America...

Q: Is that where the growth will come from in the future?

A: That is where a piece of the growth will come from.

Q: When you look at the market research, so many young people prefer diet drinks or teas.

A: We've got the world's leading dieters. If you're talking about calories, we've got the answer. In fact, we have the Coca-Cola Zero which was the most successful launch we had in 20 years. Coke Zero is zero calories and it tastes much like the original Coke. So we have an answer to that. We're very well placed, if that's what the consumer wants. We want to provide all those choices..

Q: As far as branding is concerned, how much of the branding will remain hinged on the traditional Coca-Cola? How much of it will change in the future because you've extended the name to some other products?

A: Well while we are extending the Coca-Cola name to other so many products, we're widening our portfolio. Coke Zero is still Coke. But I don't see that brand name being used on an orange drink, for example. We do have flavor variants but Coke is still the dominant brand within that set. There's so much more growth in that brand. It's such a strong brand that we're going to focus on.

Q: The youth is always an important market for any consumer product, more so for Coca-Cola which has always been identified with the young spirit. How do you intend to keep the brand young, fresh and attuned to the taste of young people?

A: Your question actually defined what we need to do, which is to stay attuned to the needs of young people. We're investing a lot in Internet network, communicating across the net, and advertising in mobile phones. We have what we need. We've got some very strong Internet programs. We got ties in Europe, with Apple, iTunes. That's the linkage.

Q: People look to Coca-Cola in the Philippines as more than just a popular product. It's a source of livelihood. It's a source of economic activity. It's a source of jobs. What is the commitment of Coca-Cola to the Philippines?

A: You talked about jobs, and that is a very important piece in the overall equation. One of the things we track, we do this country by country, we look at what we call a multiplier effect. For every job that we will add, there are actually 10 jobs added to the society overall, so the multiplier is very high -- people making signs, advertising so that's the first piece.

The second piece is how do you interact with the society? You said it yourself. We are an integral part of the society and part of that is giving back in the right way. One of the areas we specifically identified in the Philippines is education. We're also involved in a program that is providing digital platforms and radio platforms to schools.

Q: You've invested a lot in the Philippines. How bullish is the Coca-Cola Company?

A: Well, I wouldn't have gone to my board of directors and ask for $590 million if I didn't have a fundamental belief in the future of the Philippines. I don’t base that on just looking in analysis or reports of what other people think. I would base that in having lived here for years, knowing this country, knowing this society, knowing that today, I think is a better position to succeed certainly than it was in 1981 to 1985 when we first invested here. The growth rates we're seeing now is indicative of the intellectual capital and I really hope that this is a trend that's going to continue.

Tell Coca-Cola "Every Worker Counts": April 2 transatlantic Coke protest day

On April 2 the IUF is coordinating a transatlantic protest day targeting Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE), The Coca-Cola Company's largest global bottler.

Workers belonging to IUF-affiliated Coke unions in North America and Europe will join together with one voice to demand greater respect and recognition from CCE and the Coca-Cola Company.

Workers at CCE plants and distribution sites in the USA, Canada, France, Belgium, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom are uniting around a common message: "Tell Coke Every Worker Counts."

Unions representing a number of Coke employees in other bottling companies have decided to demonstrate their support for the CCE workers by joining the Transatlantic Union Day of Action.

A resolution submitted by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, which represents around 14,000 CCE and Coca-Cola workers in the USA was unanimously supported by the recent IUF 25th World Congress .

It has since been strongly supported by IUF-affiliated unions representing close to 200,000 Coke workers around the world.

The resolution demanded that Coca-Cola Enterprises and the Coca-Cola Company:

Recognize the right of their union employees to job security and union representation in cases of restructuring

Bargain with its unions over restructuring and respect rights to information and consultation about company plans without unreasonable delays and before any final decisions are made

Stop opposing workers� rights to union representation and collective bargaining

Stop cutting costs on the backs of workers by slashing employment, pay, healthcare and pension benefits to compensate for poor management and shortsighted planning.

Engage in meaningful dialogue and negotiations with their unions and works councils over a sustainable, long term strategy for growth and employment

The resolution went on to demand that the Coca-Cola Company agrees to sign a Union Rights and Recognition Agreement with the IUF and its affiliates as proposed by the IUF in October 2006 and ensures that the scope of the agreement covers the entire Coca-Cola system.